L’actualité sur l’Intelligence Collective

Page automatisée à partir de multiples flux RSS / Atom

Catalogues d’articles scientifiques

    • Feed has no items.

    • Feed has no items.

  • OpenAlex

    • The Structure of Collective Intelligence: Evidence for Collective Memory, Attention, and Reasoning
      by RSS-Bridge on 2025-11-27 at 12:00 AM

      The ability for groups to effectively collaborate is important for both economic and societal progress. Extant research has demonstrated that group performance can be explained by a general “collective intelligence” (CI) factor, but there is ongoing debate about the components of CI with important implications for our understanding of how it develops or can be enhanced. We conduct a meta-analysis with data from 22 studies and 5,279 individuals in 1,356 groups to investigate the structure of collective intelligence using factor analysis. Our analysis yields strong support for a hierarchical three-factor model, supporting a theory that collective intelligence emerges from collective memory, attention, and reasoning. The model explains the data better than other plausible alternatives, especially in established groups who had the opportunity to develop their collective cognition over time. Our findings provide new insights into the formation of collective intelligence and have important implications for the design and evaluation of interventions that aim to increase it.

    • The Structure of Collective Intelligence: Evidence for Collective Memory, Attention, and Reasoning
      by RSS-Bridge on 2025-11-27 at 12:00 AM

      The ability for groups to effectively collaborate is important for both economic and societal progress. Extant research has demonstrated that group performance can be explained by a general “collective intelligence” (CI) factor, but there is ongoing debate about the components of CI with important implications for our understanding of how it develops or can be enhanced. We conduct a meta-analysis with data from 22 studies and 5,279 individuals in 1,356 groups to investigate the structure of collective intelligence using factor analysis. Our analysis yields strong support for a hierarchical three-factor model, supporting a theory that collective intelligence emerges from collective memory, attention, and reasoning. The model explains the data better than other plausible alternatives, especially in established groups who had the opportunity to develop their collective cognition over time. Our findings provide new insights into the formation of collective intelligence and have important implications for the design and evaluation of interventions that aim to increase it.

    • Attention and collective interests in artificial intelligence: In search of a regulatory framework
      by RSS-Bridge on 2025-11-25 at 12:00 AM

      Recent debates frequently refer to artificially intelligent systems as agents, sometimes referencing their capacity for attention. Yet, the self-determination associated with agency requires a form of attention that is not yet present in artificial systems. It is thus worth asking how these artificial systems achieve the results they do. In this paper we explore the role of attention in artificial intelligence and argue that we should understand these systems as collective agents comprising the software developers, creators of training data, and users. Given this new understanding of artificial intelligence, we suggest a novel method for regulating these technologies: a corporate law approach. By treating artificially intelligent systems as corporate subcontractors, we can better protect both users and the broader public.

    • Attention and collective interests in artificial intelligence: In search of a regulatory framework
      by RSS-Bridge on 2025-11-25 at 12:00 AM

      Recent debates frequently refer to artificially intelligent systems as agents, sometimes referencing their capacity for attention. Yet, the self-determination associated with agency requires a form of attention that is not yet present in artificial systems. It is thus worth asking how these artificial systems achieve the results they do. In this paper we explore the role of attention in artificial intelligence and argue that we should understand these systems as collective agents comprising the software developers, creators of training data, and users. Given this new understanding of artificial intelligence, we suggest a novel method for regulating these technologies: a corporate law approach. By treating artificially intelligent systems as corporate subcontractors, we can better protect both users and the broader public.

    • Universality in Collective Intelligence on the Rubik’s Cube
      by RSS-Bridge on 2025-11-23 at 12:00 AM

      Progress in understanding expert performance is limited by the scarcity of quantitative data on long-term knowledge acquisition and deployment. Here we use the Rubik’s Cube as a cognitive model system existing at the intersection of puzzle solving, skill learning, expert knowledge, cultural transmission, and group theory. By studying competitive cube communities, we find evidence for universality in the collective learning of the Rubik’s Cube in both sighted and blindfolded conditions: expert performance follows exponential progress curves whose parameters reflect the delayed acquisition of algorithms that shorten solution paths. Blindfold solves form a distinct problem class from sighted solves and are constrained not only by expert knowledge but also by the skill improvements required to overcome short-term memory bottlenecks, a constraint shared with blindfold chess. Cognitive artifacts such as the Rubik’s Cube help solvers navigate an otherwise enormous mathematical state space. In doing so, they sustain collective intelligence by integrating communal knowledge stores with individual expertise and skill, illustrating how expertise can, in practice, continue to deepen over the course of a single lifetime.

Laboratoires

  • MIT CCI

  • AI4CI

    • Bridge returned error 500! (20419)
      by RSS-Bridge on 2025-11-27 at 5:42 PM

      Details Type: Exception Code: 500 Message: Could not request AI4CI Outputs via proxy. HTTP Code: 0 File: lib/utils.php Line: 252 Trace #0 index.php(73): RssBridge->main() #1 lib/RssBridge.php(39): RssBridge->{closure}() #2 lib/RssBridge.php(37): CacheMiddleware->__invoke() #3 middlewares/CacheMiddleware.php(44): RssBridge->{closure}() #4 lib/RssBridge.php(37): ExceptionMiddleware->__invoke() #5 middlewares/ExceptionMiddleware.php(17): RssBridge->{closure}() #6 lib/RssBridge.php(37): SecurityMiddleware->__invoke() #7 middlewares/SecurityMiddleware.php(19): RssBridge->{closure}() #8 lib/RssBridge.php(37): MaintenanceMiddleware->__invoke() #9 middlewares/MaintenanceMiddleware.php(10): RssBridge->{closure}() #10 lib/RssBridge.php(37): BasicAuthMiddleware->__invoke() #11 middlewares/BasicAuthMiddleware.php(13): RssBridge->{closure}() #12 lib/RssBridge.php(37): TokenAuthenticationMiddleware->__invoke() #13 middlewares/TokenAuthenticationMiddleware.php(10): RssBridge->{closure}() #14 lib/RssBridge.php(34): DisplayAction->__invoke() #15 actions/DisplayAction.php(54): DisplayAction->createResponse() #16 actions/DisplayAction.php(89): Ai4ciOutputsBridge->collectData() #17 bridges/Ai4ciOutputsBridge.php(35): returnServerError() #18 lib/utils.php(252) Context Query: action=display&bridge=Ai4ciOutputsBridge&format=Atom Version: 2025-01-26 OS: Linux PHP: 8.3.23 Go back Find similar bugs Create GitHub Issue https://all-as.one

Vidéos

  • Fouloscopie

    • On visite l’expo FOULES, avec @Lea_Bello et @CyrusNorth
      by Fouloscopie on 2025-11-03 at 4:03 AM

      L’exposition “FOULES” est prolongée jusqu’au 26 MAI 2024, à la Cité des Sciences et de l’Industrie, à Paris. Si vous l’avez déjà visitée, n’hésitez pas à me faire un retour en commentaire. Bonne visite !Et ne manquez pas la chaîne youtube de Léa : https://www.youtube.com/@UC-jcC3zw4pXOn8t3keKY__g Et celle de Cyrus : https://www.youtube.com/@UCah8C0gmLkdtvsy0b2jrjrw *** POUR ME SOUTENIR ***➡️ sur Tipeee : https://fr.tipeee.com/fouloscopie➡️ sur Utip : https://utip.io/fouloscopie Merci !*** MES RECHERCHES ***Mon laboratoire de recherche à l’institut Max Planck : https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/research-centers/adaptive-rationalityMa thèse de doctorat : http://mehdimoussaid.com/TheseMoussaid.pdf

    • La MAJORITÉ a-t-elle toujours RAISON ?
      by Fouloscopie on 2025-10-31 at 10:17 PM

      Doit-on toujours s’appuyer sur la loi de la majorité ? Peut-on influencer le jugement collectif ? Pour répondre à ces questions, 100 abonnés de ma chaîne ont accepté de participer à une expérience sociale. Voici ce que l’on a découvert…Pour consulter la liste complète des questions que je leur ai posées : https://fouloscopie.com/la-majorite-a-t-elle-toujours-raison-7 *** POUR ME SOUTENIR ***➡️ sur Tipeee : https://fr.tipeee.com/fouloscopie➡️ sur KKBB : https://www.kisskissbankbank.com/fr/projects/fouloscopieMerci !*** MES RECHERCHES ***Mon laboratoire de recherche à l’institut Max Planck : https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/research-centers/adaptive-rationalityMa thèse de doctorat : http://mehdimoussaid.com/TheseMoussaid.pdf** POUR ALLER PLUS LOIN **Les travaux précurseurs de Condorcet :De Condorcet, N. (1785). Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Cambridge University Press.L’article de Iain Couzin sur le choix collectif des poissons : Couzin, I. D.et al. (2011). Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups. Science, 334(6062), 1578-1580.

    • En 5 niveaux de difficulté : comment fonctionne un banc de poissons ?
      by Fouloscopie on 2025-10-31 at 4:58 PM

      🔔 Pensez à vous abonner et à activer la cloche pour ne pas rater mes futures vidéos 🔔Pour soutenir la chaîne :➡️ sur Tipeee : https://fr.tipeee.com/fouloscopie➡️ sur KissKiss : https://www.kisskissbankbank.com/fr/projects/fouloscopiePour en savoir plus sur mes recherches :➡️ Mon laboratoire de recherche à l’institut Max Planck : https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/research-centers/adaptive-rationality➡️ Ma thèse de doctorat : http://mehdimoussaid.com/TheseMoussaid.pdfEnfin quelques références bibliographiques :➡️ Niveau 1 : – La description des configurations de nage dans les bancs de poissons : Parrish, J. K., Viscido, S. V., & Grunbaum, D. (2002). Self-organized fish schools: an examination of emergent properties. The biological bulletin, 202(3), 296-305.– L’hypothèse de la télépathie :Selous, E. (1932)Thought Transference (or What ?) in Birds . Nature 129, 263 – À propos de l’effet Trafalgar :Treherne, J. E., & Foster, W. A. (1981). Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: the Trafalgar effect. Animal Behaviour, 29(3), 911-917.➡️ Niveau 2 : – Le premier modele d’Aoki :Ichiro AOKI, A Simulation Study on the Schooling Mechanism in Fish, NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, 1982, Volume 48, Issue 8, Pages 1081-1088– Le modele de Craig Reynolds:Reynolds, C. W. (1987, August). Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 25-34).– L’article de Iain Couzin:Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., James, R., Ruxton, G. D., & Franks, N. R. (2002). Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. Journal of theoretical biology, 218(1), 1-11.– Le simulateur en ligne que j’utilise est disponible ici :https://www.complexity-explorables.org/explorables/flockn-roll/➡️ Niveau 3 : – L’étude sur le nombre d’influences dans les vols d’étourneaux :Ballerini, M., Cabibbo, N., Candelier, R., Cavagna, A., Cisbani, E., Giardina, I., … & Zdravkovic, V. (2008). Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 105(4), 1232-1237.➡️ Niveau 4 : – L’étude de Iain Couzin sur les réseaux d’influence:Rosenthal, S. B., Twomey, C. R., Hartnett, A. T., Wu, H. S., & Couzin, I. D. (2015). Revealing the hidden networks of interaction in mobile animal groups allows prediction of complex behavioral contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(15), 4690-4695.– La validation du modèle visuel : Strandburg-Peshkin, A., Twomey, C. R., Bode, N. W., Kao, A. B., Katz, Y., Ioannou, C. C., … & Couzin, I. D. (2013). Visual sensory networks and effective information transfer in animal groups. Current Biology, 23(17), R709-R711.➡️ Niveau 5 : – Les animations de spins sont extraites sur site https://toutestquantique.fr/ conduit notamment par l’excellent Julien Bobroff– L’illustration de la temperature de Curie provient de la conférence de Hugo Duminil-Copin, ici : https://youtu.be/f__dFfsqKJI?si=mZVSrgqG3B7iccM5– L’article fondateur de Tamas Vicsek sur le lien entre magnétisme et essaims d’animaux : Vicsek, T., Czirók, A., Ben-Jacob, E., Cohen, I., & Shochet, O. (1995). Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Physical review letters, 75(6), 1226.– L’article d’Andrea Cavagna et Giorgio Parisi sur la criticalité des vols d’étourneaux : Cavagna, A., Cimarelli, A., Giardina, I., Parisi, G., Santagati, R., Stefanini, F., & Viale, M. (2010). Scale-free correlations in starling flocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(26), 11865-11870.

    • Combien faut-il de personnes pour lancer UNE RÉVOLUTION ? ✊✊✊
      by Fouloscopie on 2025-10-31 at 1:01 PM

      Grande nouvelle : je suis en train de préparer la deuxième saison des expériences participatives ! Inscrivez-vous ici pour être informé du lancement de la campagne, soutenir le projet et participer aux expériences : ➡️ https://www.kisskissbankbank.com/fr/projects/fouloscopie-100x-saison2 ⬅️Rendez-vous à la rentrée pour le démarrage du projet !Bonne vacances !

    • Comment gérer 3 millions de pèlerins à La Mecque ?
      by Fouloscopie on 2025-10-31 at 12:26 AM

      🔔 Pensez à vous abonner et à activer la cloche pour ne pas rater mes futures vidéos 🔔Le pèlerinage de La Mecque est-il dangereux ? Comment les chercheurs aident-ils à sécuriser le pèlerinage ? Quelles découvertes scientifiques ont été réalisées à partir des images de surveillance ? Je vous explique tout ça dans cette vidéo.Pour soutenir la chaîne :➡️ sur Tipeee : https://fr.tipeee.com/fouloscopie➡️ sur KissKiss : https://www.kisskissbankbank.com/fr/projects/fouloscopiePour en savoir plus sur mes recherches :➡️ Mon laboratoire de recherche à l’institut Max Planck : https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/research-centers/adaptive-rationality➡️ Ma thèse de doctorat : http://mehdimoussaid.com/TheseMoussaid.pdfSi vous avez manqué les deux premiers épisodes de la série : ➡️ EPISODE 1 : https://youtu.be/mhLKT4D2YvI➡️ EPISODE 2 : https://youtu.be/qojBLk-h6rkEnfin quelques références bibliographiques :– L’article de Dirk Helbing sur l’accident de 2006 : Helbing, D., Johansson, A., & Al-Abideen, H. Z. (2007). Dynamics of crowd disasters: An empirical study. Physical review E, 75(4), 046109

Divers